Social Media Exclusivity: Are you In or Out?

December 4, 2008 at 4:38 pm 2 comments

Are you in the ‘in’ crowd or the ‘everybody’s in’ crowd?

Smart marketers understand that we want what we can’t have. They use the allure of exclusivity to build their brands — at times, creating limits just so they can surpass them. It’s the simple economics of supply and demand that when executed well, can make companies thrive.

But does this work for social media?

Social media communities are structured into two main types: Open and Closed.

Open Communities ( think MySpace), invite everyone to join. By breaking down doors (or eliminating them entirely) this method creates an ease of access that encourages fast growth. The success of MySpace and other free online tools (think: hotmail, yahoo groups) can be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that signing up is quick, easy, and open to all.

Closed Communities (think early Facebook), are based on idea of extreme exclusivity. They use the allure of being a part of something private, to make the community more enticing and build membership.

The overwhelming success of Facebook, clearly shows that Closed Communities do work — at least when executed well.  Even though exclusive sites like Facebook must turn away interested members/customers in order to maintain privacy, and even though those not allowed join may create negative feedback and be reluctant to join should the doors open to everyone down the road…

Interests: “Didn’t I already do this on MySpace?”
–A profile quote from a Facebook latecomer and former MySpace user.

…easily accessibly sites like MySpace open the door for fake profiles, unwanted connections, and spam messaging. These privacy issues make some hesitant to join or unhappy once they have and even more likely to leave in the long run.

And when it comes down to it, privacy and security are deal breaker issues for many people.

And it’s the ability of exclusive communities to better control information of their memebers that contributes to their long term success. Facebook may have taken longer to gain momentum but as of April, 2008, according to TechCrunch they finally caught up to MySpace in unique visitors.


But here’s the kicker: Facebook took the crown only after they opend their doors to the public. What this shows us is that, both methods may need to be tapped into to ensure long term success. (Does long term success exist in Social Media???) By basing their community around the idea of exclusivity and (essentially) privacy, they were able to maintain control of the community as it grew. And once they platform was established, they opened the doors to the world and in doing so, came the closest to living on both sides of the tracks as a social media platform could do.


Entry filed under: social media. Tags: , , , .

Social Media Marketing: Are GenYs Lagging Behind? When Leapfrogs Can’t Find the Next Big Thing

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Qlubb-Andy  |  December 5, 2008 at 9:42 am

    It’s interesting how sites like Oursquare never really took off even though they were all about exclusivity. Perhaps they came out too early but one of the other things that Facebook did well was have was an application platform that provided easy-to-use utility (albeit social) to its members. Thanks for the post!

  • 2. meganmaguire  |  January 14, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Thanks for the feedback. This post is my first attempt at what seems to be a huge topic. There are so many things that factor into the success of a site but certainly ease of use ranks high.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

RSS @megan_maguire

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

%d bloggers like this: